manuscript under editorial consideration nature biotechnology
You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Science Robotics. provided that you revise the paper to address a number of further editorial points. Use of an LLM should be properly documented in the Methods section (and if a Methods section is not available, in a suitable alternative part) of the manuscript. Figure captions begin with the term Fig. and JavaScript. [CDATA[> Please refer to the Authorship Principles section below for more information on how to complete this section. The portal also provides authors links so that they can quickly register a new resource and obtain an RRID. Interests outside the 3-year time frame must be disclosed if they could reasonably be perceived as influencing the submitted work. This work was supported by [] (Grant numbers [] and []. All lines should be at least 0.1 mm (0.3 pt) wide. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal, the professionalism of scientific authorship, and ultimately the entire scientific endeavour. Please remember that the reviewers you suggest should be totally independent, and not connected to you or your work in any way. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Nature Sustainability (Nat Sustain) To obtain Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of University B (Date/No.)., This is an observational study. Data availability statements should include information on where data supporting the results reported in the article can be found, if applicable. in bold type, followed by the figure number, also in bold type. ISSN 2398-9629 (online). This is because you have been informed that your paper is under consideration for publication. This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. We first read and discuss each manuscript in light of our editorial criteria and . Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. Although retrospective studies are conducted on already available data or biological material (for which formal consent may not be needed or is difficult to obtain) ethics approval may be required dependent on the law and the national ethical guidelines of a country. The submitted work should be original and should not have been published elsewhere in any form or language (partially or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work. If this is not possible, the cover letter must include a means of verifying each author such as an ORCID or Scopus ID or a link to their publication record(s). a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the issues raised by the editor and peer reviewers, a response to each of the reviewers, replying to each of the points raised. Non-financial interests: In addition, authors are requested to disclose interests that go beyond financial interests that could impart bias on the work submitted for publication such as professional interests, personal relationships or personal beliefs (amongst others). ensuring that all listed authors have approved the manuscript before submission, including the names and order of authors; managing all communication between the Journal and all co-authors, before and after publication;*.
Kevin Kelley Salary Presbyterian,
Articles M